Comments on: Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (RA 9995)

By: Magoichi Saika

Magoichi Saika — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:29:43 +0000

I’m no lawyer, but the way I see it no way can that person be convicted of first-degree murder. First-degree murder is planning to kill and successfully doing so. The idiot here failed to do so. Apparently God was the first-degree murderer here. The most the idiot can get is second-degree murder or common law murder which is non-intentional or murders that you planned but failed to finish.

By: Magoichi Saika

Magoichi Saika — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:19:34 +0000

jhony martin alba, may I try to answer your question like a person with common sense?

Kissing between two lips is never sexual in itself, only the end-purpose of the kissing two lips can really determine the sexuality of such. Ergo, if kissing is used to stimulate sexually, then it’s sexual. But I doubt this will ever be included in that Anti-Photo Law.

On the other hand, together with licking, sucking, and poking… kissing is part of felatio (blow job) and cunnilingus (p*s*y lick).

In this case, it’s definitely sexual — unless you’re an animal cleaning up your loved one.

By: csp

csp — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:43:21 +0000

What if the suspect actually captures the images or videos is overseas and the subject is a phil citizen in Phil, how will this law work?

By: Atty. James Biron

Atty. James Biron — Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:51:03 +0000

Jhony, please post your question at the forum section of this website. I will answer your question once I see it there.

By: odette

odette — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:53:30 +0000

i want to know if there has criminal liability for death of a person you attack but died due to lightnings?
thank you

By: jhony martin alba

jhony martin alba — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:17:37 +0000

atty. is kissing considered as sexual act under this law? if not, in what way it can be considered as such? thanks

By: jhony martin alba

jhony martin alba — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:17:16 +0000

atty. is kissing considered as sexual act under this law? if not, in what way it can be considered as such? thanks

By: angel

angel — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:36:19 +0000

i like this law!!

By: ivanrod t. suello

ivanrod t. suello — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:48:52 +0000

thanks for the info..

By: Atty. James Biron

Atty. James Biron — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:34:16 +0000

Atty. Allan, the law is silent regarding the territorial jurisdiction unlike in Art. 360 of the RPC which is very clear in stating the rule regarding the territorial jurisdiction.

In this case, we will apply the basic rule that in criminal actions, the place where the criminal offense was committed determines the venue.

Thus if the offender used his computer in Quezon City to spread the pictures, you have to file the complaint in QC, but if he used a computer in an internet cafe in Makati City, you have to file it in Makati because that is where the offense was committed.